Fixed punishment for each type of crime
Some people feel that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others feel that the circumstances of an offence should be taken into account when deciding on a punishment.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Moel Solution
A few individuals have a belief that a uniform punishment should be in action for all types of crimes. While another section of people advocate to consider the facts of the particular case in order to decide punishment, this essay will discuss both perspectives and provide my personal viewpoint.
Those in favour of fixed punishments argue that they promote legal system clarity and consistency. By designating predetermined penalties to specific offences, it is believed that justice is served equally for all individuals who commit similar crimes. This method promotes public confidence in the legal system by ensuring impartiality and predictability. In contrast, proponents of taking into account the circumstances of an offence believe that a more individualised approach to punishment is required. They argue that factors such as intent, motivation, and criminal background should be considered. Thus, sentencing can more accurately reflect the unique circumstances of each case. Rather than relying solely on a standard framework, this strategy seeks to achieve fairness by tailoring punishments to specific circumstances.
Although fixed punishments may have advantages in terms of consistency and openness, I believe it is essential to consider the circumstances surrounding a crime. Every transgression is characterised by its own complexities and unique set of circumstances, which necessitate a thorough investigation. This nuance is overlooked when all cases are treated identically. In an ideal world, a balanced approach incorporating both components would be the most effective way to administer equitable justice. Establishing general guidelines for certain categories of crimes can ensure uniformity across similar cases while allowing judges or judicial bodies to consider relevant factors when determining appropriate punishments.
In conclusion, there are conflicting views on whether fixed punishments or consideration of circumstances are more suitable when deciding on penalties for crimes. While fixed punishments provide uniformity, taking into account individual circumstances allows for more personalized outcomes. Striking a balance between these two approaches appears to be the fairest means of serving justice in our society.
Model Solution – Version 2
In today’s society, perspectives on the appropriate approach to crime and punishment vary significantly. While some advocate for fixed punishments for each type of crime, others contend that the unique circumstances and motivations behind individual offences should be carefully considered in determining appropriate penalties. This essay will explore both views before providing a reasoned conclusion.
Those in favour of fixed punishments argue that clear and consistent consequences provide a strong deterrent effect and promote fairness in the justice system. By assigning predetermined sentences to specific crimes, proponents believe that individuals are dissuaded from committing illegal acts, knowing the exact repercussions they would face. Moreover, adherents emphasize the importance of standardizing punishments to ensure equity across similar offences, thereby reducing potential biases or disparities within the judicial process.
On the other hand, proponents of considering individual circumstances when determining punishments assert that such an approach leads to more just and effective outcomes. They argue that factors such as intent, prior behaviour, mental state, and the impact on victims should all be taken into account when deciding on suitable penalties. Advocates maintain that tailoring punishment to fit the particulars of each case promotes rehabilitation and reintegration while addressing underlying issues contributing to criminal behaviour.
In conclusion, while fixed punishments offer clarity and consistency within the justice system, disregarding individual circumstances may lead to unjust outcomes. Considering context and motivation provides opportunities for fairer results tailored to each offender’s situation.
Check Out More Samples of IELTS Essays on Crime
Better education is the most effective way to prevent crimes