Advantages of spending on disease prevention than on treatments

Out of a country’s health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Sample Solution

Some government health budgets are said to be better spent on raising public awareness than on treating diseases. In other words, if the locals knew to avoid getting sick, they wouldn’t have to undergo treatment for ignorance. I believe that instead of enhancing treatment strategies, ministries should concentrate on educating people and promoting preventative measures.

First of all, though some managers think that hospitals and medical centres should be developed, they waste more money on trying to expand their knowledge in this area. For instance, while the COVID-19 virus spread, various governments have attempted a range of therapeutic attitudes toward ending the pandemic. However, there is no proof that it will be controlled in the future. So, they have thus wasted a lot of money in trying to know how to end it.

On the other hand, some people say that there would be no need to push societies forward in terms of the medical business if sanitary lessons had been taught totally at schools and students knew what fell under the repercussions. If the world had taught the concept of social distance right from the start, for instance, it wouldn’t have pandemics like it did with COVID-19. Therefore, it is very important to know how not to fall sick.

To summarize, though governments spend a reasonable portion of their budget on healthcare, other people prefer to spend the same on education so that people can prevent being ill in the first place. Not only that, but I would undoubtedly support the philosophy of prevention, which outsmarts misty treatment options since there is no guarantee that any treatment method being pursued would work.